Quora is a new social question and answer website that's receiving plenty of buzz. It functions on a simple premise: Ask a question (either to the community or an individual) and wait for the answers. You can also follow questions, topics, or people and read all the updates related to them on your home page. It’s simple enough, but beyond that, some of Quora’s features can get murky.
One questionable feature is the “pop quiz.” Quora gives an impromptu grammar exam to all members who post a question for the first time. The quiz asks users to select the correct sentence out of a list of grammatically incorrect sentences. This is intended to keep post quality at a high level, however future use doesn’t require a quiz, so the grammatically-challenged could continue to post if they can guess correctly the first time.
Another point of contention is the ability of users to edit others’ questions. For example, I recently asked, "Where can I find the best Hawaiian food in New York?" Another user edited my question to read, "Where is the best Hawaiian food in New York?" In this instance, I don't think my question was ambiguous enough to warrant an edit. Plus, if users can edit each other’s questions, why the need for the grammar quiz in the first place?
In order to implement quality control on the answers people give, Quora employs a system of "upvoting" and "downvoting." Upvoting a response displays it higher up in the queue of responses. With enough upvotes, an answer will appear first in the queue, implying that its content is of the highest quality because the community approved it.
All of these measures have so far made Quora more attractive and valuable to a smart but small user base of entrepreneurs, venture capitalists and technologists. As the site grows, it will be interesting to see if the dynamics that make it useful today will still be in place. Will the...
0 comments:
Post a Comment